Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(3)2024 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337776

RESUMO

(1) Background: This study assessed the spatial position and anatomical features associated with impacted third molars through a map-reading strategy employing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). (2) Methods: The positioning of impacted third molars on CBCT was assessed using Winter's and Pell and Gregory's classifications. External root resorption in mandibular second molars was categorized according to Herman's classification. Additionally, the relationship between the mandibular third molar root apex and the mandibular canal was examined. Comparative statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test, with a significance level considered as 5%. (3) Results: The results indicated that, based on Winter's classification, 48.06 % of impacted teeth were positioned mesioangularly. Employing Pell and Gregory's classification, 43.22% of the impacted molars fell into positions B and C, with 54.2% classified as Class II. A notable 69.7% of teeth exhibited no contact between the root apex and the mandibular canal, and external root resorption in the distal aspect of the second molar was absent in 88.7% of cases. (4) Conclusions: Utilizing the map-reading strategy with CBCT scans to assess the anatomical positions and characteristics of impacted third molars enhances professional confidence and sets a standard for quality and safety in the surgical procedure for patients.

2.
Polymers (Basel) ; 15(22)2023 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38006133

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of Chitosan 0.2% in various final cleaning methods on the bond strength of fiberglass post (FP) to intrarradicular dentin. Ninety bovine incisors were sectioned to obtain root remnants measuring 18 mm in length. The roots were divided: G1: EDTA 17%; G2: EDTA 17% + PUI; G3: EDTA 17% + EA; G4: EDTA 17% + XPF; G5: Chitosan 2%; G6: Chitosan 2% + PUI; G7: Chitosan 2% + EA; G8: Chitosan 2% +XPF. After carrying out the cleaning methods, the posts were installed, and the root was cleaved to generate two disks from each root third. Bond strength values (MPa) obtained from the micro push-out test data were assessed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner tests for multiple comparisons (α = 5%). Differences were observed in the cervical third between G1 and G8 (p = 0.038), G4 and G8 (p = 0.003), G6 and G8 (p = 0.049), and Control and G8 (p = 0.019). The final cleaning method influenced the adhesion strength of cemented FP to intrarradicular dentin. Chitosan 0.2% + XPF positively influenced adhesion strength, with the highest values in the cervical third.

3.
ROBRAC ; 28(84): 1-4, jan./mar. 2019. Ilus, Tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1049218

RESUMO

Objetivo: Avaliar a acurácia, sensibilidade e especificidade de diferentes filtros do software Cliniview™ (versão 10.1) em radiografias periapicais digitais na detecção de fraturas radiculares verticais em dentes unirradiculares. Material e Métodos: Foram utilizados 31 dentes humanos recém-extraídos divididos em dois grupos: controle (CTL) e fraturado (FTR), constituídos por 15 e 16 dentes, respectivamente. Realizou-se o tratamento endodôntico dos dentes para posterior desobturação de 2/3 da raiz e confecção dos pinos metálicos. Após cimentação dos pinos, as raízes dos dentes grupo FTR foram fraturadas na máquina de ensaio (Instron). As radiografias periapicais digitais foram obtidas em todos os dentes com sistema digital Express™. As radiografias originais e com aplicação dos filtros (inversão na escala de cinza, hot, nitidez 1, vertical e vertical + horizontal) foram salvas e avaliadas por dois especialistas. Após as análises, foram calculados os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade, preditivo positivo, preditivo negativo e acurácia da radiografia periapical digital com e sem a aplicação dos filtros. Resultados: Considerando os dois examinadores, os maiores valores de acuraria, sensibilidade e especificidade para as imagens originais foram de 85,2%, 100% e 95,2% respectivamente. Para as radiografias com aplicação de filtro, os maiores valores de acurácia, sensibilidade e especificidade foram de 82,6%, 71,4% e 87,5%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O uso de filtros não aumentou os valores de acurácia, sensibilidade e especificidade das radiografias periapicais digitais para a detecção das fraturas radiculares verticais. De fato, pelo contrário, em alguns casos, o diagnóstico piorou.


Objective: To evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different Cliniview™ (version 10.1) software filters in digital periapical radiographs for the detection of vertical root fractures in single-rooted teeth. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one human teeth freshly extracted were divided into two groups: control (CTL) and fractured (FTR), constituted by 15 and 16 teeth respectively. The endodontic treatment of the teeth was performed and followed by desobturation of ⅔ of the root canal and the metallic posts confection. After the cementation of the posts, the fractures were made using the universal test machine (Instron) only in the FTR group. The digital periapical radiographs were performed in all the teeth using the ExpressTM digital system. The original radiographs and the ones with applied filters (gray scale, hot, sharpness 1, vertical and vertical + horizontal) were saved and evaluated by two specialists. After the analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the digital periapical radiographs with and without the application of filters were calculated. Results: Taking into consideration the two examiners, the highest accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values for the original images were 85,2%, 100% and 95,2% respectively. For the radiographs with applied filters, the highest accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values found were of 82,6%, 71,4% and 87,5%, respectively. Conclusion: The use of filters did not increase the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values of the digital periapical radiographs for the detection of VRF. In fact, on the contrary, for some cases, the diagnosis became worse.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...